kmfkneon.blogg.se - Darktable fuji film simulation

I should familiarize myself with the filmic rgb module.This is simply awesome with darktable! If you don't know how this works, watch ADVANCED MASKING Techniques in darktable. I work with drawn and/or parametric masks.Of course, I often use perspective correction and crop & rotate.Other modules I frequently use are haze removal, sharpen, color correction, contrast equalizer, contrast/brightness/saturation.

If parts are too dark or too bright, I play with the exposure, and/or the tone equalizer, or the shadows and highlights module, or the graduated density tool.

In addition to by standard workflow modules (the baseline"), I often use the following modules:

It is a description how I achieve the Fuji film simulation look with darktable. Here's my darktable workflow to provide a decent baseline. Changing line 195 from “Development Dynamic Range” to “Dynamic Range” fixes the problem.So I use my photos either OOC or processed with darktable. RAF causes the same error.Īpparently in the X-H2/S files (possibly the X-T5 as well) there is no entry in the exif data called “Development Dynamic Range” only “Dynamic Range”. config/darktable/lua/contrib/fujifilm_auto_a:195: attempt to concatenate a nil value (field 'Development Dynamic Range')įor the record, renaming my file to end in. config/darktable/lua/contrib/fujifilm_auto_a:195: attempt to concatenate a nil value (field 'Development Dynamic Range') Which fixes the issues with case sensitive file systems (like Linux). If not string.match(string.upper(image.filename), "%.RAF$") then If not string.match(image.filename, "%.RAF$") then On line 182 of the script I changed it from: OK, the “Ignoring raw file” error is because you are testing for the file to end in.